首页
文献服务
文献资源
外文期刊
外文会议
中文期刊
专业机构
智能制造
高级检索
版权声明
使用帮助
Captive Vs. Commercial Heat Treaters? - A Split Decision
刊名：
Gear Technology
作者：
Jack McGuinn
刊号：
782B0082
ISSN：
0743-6858
出版年：
2007
年卷期：
2007, vol.24, no.6
页码：
58-62
总页数：
5
分类号：
TG5
语种：
eng
文摘：
Heat treating is a vital step in the gear making process - that's a given. But how that step is taken can happen in a number of ways. For one, there is a goodly number of gear manufacturers that invest in keeping the heat treat process in-house, along with the not insignificant attendant overhead - i.e., equipment, trained personnel, quality control, R&D, metallurgy, environmental clean-up, etc. Then, too, there are well-respected gear makers with no heat treat capabilities that outsource the work to commercial shops. Let's take a look at three companies - a gear manufacturer and two commercial heat treaters - that are useful examples of both captive and commercial heat treating. We'll examine the pros and cons of each scenario, as well as how our gear maker came to heat treat in-house, and what commercial heat treaters have to offer. All of which leads to the question: Who does it better?
©2016机械工业出版社（机械工业信息研究院） 京ICP备05055788号-35